Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 301 - 320 of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by Adam Wagner
This is in contrast to the situation in the United States where the Supreme Court has a mandate to change the law if it breaches the constitution. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by INFORRM
  When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  Details of the mechanism of the alleged fraud can be found in the Opinions of Lord Tyre, [2015] CSOH 150, and Lord Doherty, [2016] CSOH 107. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
C v United Kingdom Application no. 37334/08 – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has rejected as manifestly ill-founded a complaint that the offence of strict liability for rape of a child under 13 violated the right to a presumption if innocence under Article 6 and respect for private life under Article 8. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Citing with approval the recent  judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Neuberger, delivering the judgment of the Court, stated that whether a party was 'making' something was a "a matter of fact and degree". [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Photo Credit: United States Marshal’s Service [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury has awarded bakery owner David Gibson damages of $11 million against Oberlin College which had accused Gibsons Bakery of having a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. [read post]