Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 41 - 60 of 990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2008, 12:38 am
United States, 464 U.S. 814 (1983). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
Kennedy announced the Court's 5-4 ruling making same-sex marriage lawful in every state in the United States of America. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Infringement of Claim 3 The  focus of the infringement ruling is Claim 3, stating  --“use of pregabalin for the preparation of a pharmaceutical composition for treating neuropathic pain”.The claim in question is a purpose-limited process claim. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This also reflects the position of the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by Rokia Hassanein
” Another commissioner said Bormuth was “attacking . . . my Lord and savior Jesus Christ. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The High Court ruled that it must follow the House of Lords’ decision in Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 58 which stated detention without charge in that case was necessary for reasons of security and was therefore authorised by the United National Security Council Resolution 1546, and by reason of the United Nations Charter, art 103, that obligation prevailed over the detainee’s rights under art 5(1). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:28 am by Brian Cordery
Brian Cordery and Claire Phipps-JonesThe UK Supreme Court today handed down its decision in Actavis v ICOS. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark.  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:16 am
It will be the whole or, if it is divided into economic units, the relevant unit of the employer's business" (para. 41). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am by Legal Beagle
As a party litigant without representation, Mr Wilson was, according to court observers, forced abroad to Japan and the United States for supportive expert medical reports. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
On Tuesday 7 November, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance, and Dyson) heard the appeal of the parents of a young woman, Melanie Rabone, who committed suicide while on home release from a psychiatric unit at Stepping Hill Hospital. [read post]