Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 61 - 80 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:28 pm by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Monday 12 November 2012 and running for four days is the appeal of Imperial Tobacco Ltd v The Lord Advocate. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
It was not because nationals other Member States may qualify for the Credit in question (Lord Hope, giving the main judgment, states in terms that “had a right to reside in the United Kingdom…been the sole condition of entitlement to state pension credit, it would without doubt have been directly discriminatory on grounds of nationality”: para 26); it was because not all UK nationals would be able to meet the test of habitual residence (“some UK… [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
In answering the issues, the Court of Appeal relied upon the (minority) judgment of Lord Hoffman in Cambridge Gas Transportation Corporation v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings [2006] UKPC 26, and Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd [2008] UKHL 21, finding that foreign court proceedings could in fact be recognised in this case under the Model Law. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs also seek an injunction to close the Lord Flat Trail to motorized vehicle use. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]