Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 81 - 100 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Carnwath provisionally stated that the decision in 2005 was the exercise of prerogative powers for the conduct of foreign relations. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Lord Bannatyne stated that it was not his task “to prefer one body of evidence to another rather it was for the pursuer to demonstrate that the views of the defenders’ experts were illogical or irrational. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Section 10 demonstrates the goodwill of Parliament that Parliament can and will function to protect the interests of each part of the United Kingdom, even in the absence of meaningful representation in Westminster. 11:25: Ronan Lavery QC says absence of consideration of NI in these circumstances is gross. 11:21:& [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Some months after an initial contact made in late 2012 Mr Greenwald met Edward Snowden, who provided him with encrypted data which had been stolen from the National Security Agency  of the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:19 pm
Illueca, Enforcing the United Nations Security Council’s Arms Embargo on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: A Case Study of the Legal Consequences of the Chong Chon Gang Incident Stephen Allen, Dean v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether… [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
None of the children in Chavez-Vilchez lived in family units with parents living together and in each instance the context was pegged to the factual basis that if the non-EU citizen mother leaves and the EU citizen father remains, will the EU citizen child be compelled, in practice, to leave? [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
United States Applications for summary judgment have been filed in “Dr. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Hale stated the appellant was clearly entitled to a declaration that the application of the settlement criterion breached her rights under art 14 and A2P1 of the convention. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
This is how he interprets the case law of the ECtHR at [109]: “It is true that in S v United Kingdom the court does not expressly refer to the reasonable expectation of privacy but its analysis seems to me to be consistent with it. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The UKSC Appeal The appeal will be heard on 18 and 19 November 2015 by a panel of five comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption and Lord Carnwath. [read post]