Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 121 - 140 of 978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The statutory definition of ‘hereditament’ in the General Rate Act 1967, s 115(1), states that it is “such a unit of … property which is, or would fall to be, shown as a separate item in the valuation list. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
All placements of insurance in the United States are generally subject to state premium taxation, but the responsible taxpayer depends on the type of insurance policy issued. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Libby Payne, Olswang LLP
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area.  [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
R (HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa  Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Rick Pildes
  In adopting this new defense, Canada followed the lead of the then-House of Lords in England, which had transformed English defamation law in 2006 and 1999 decisions by embracing the "responsible journalism" defense.Ever since New York Times v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v)  It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation.  [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am by Gilles Cuniberti
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT Lord Wilson gives the lead judgment of the Court. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
Where, as in Saunders v United Kingdom (1997) 23 EHRR 313 and the present case, a person is asked questions at a stage when he has not been charged and the questioning does not form part of a criminal investigation, article 6 will not be engaged. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am by Jani
As the court stated, reiterating Lord Justice Oliver in Anheuser-Buch v Budejovicky Budvar NP, that goodwill is very much "localized" and that "...reputation which may, no doubt, and frequently does, exist without any supporting local business… does not by itself constitute a property which the law protects". [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  Punitive damages can, for example, be awarded in defamation cases in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 7:19 am by Eunice R. Chung
The Asylum intends to premiere its 'Age of the Hobbits' on DVD/VOD in the United States on 11 December 2012, just three days prior to the Plaintiffs' domestic theatrical release of 'The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey'. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989).United States v. [read post]