Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 161 - 180 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2013, 10:26 am by Charon QC
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling,  continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for  satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice  system with it. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The US Department of Justice under the Trump administration secretly obtained the phone and email records of a CNN reporter who covers the Pentagon, the network reported. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Libel actions – here or the United States? [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
Lord Toulson’s judgment Lord Toulson reached the same ultimate conclusion as the other Lords but agreed with the approach taken by the Court of Appeal that, given the defence itself is based on public policy, it is right that other public policy considerations should be taken into account (Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States and Dean Mazzone's article that I linked to yesterday. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
The Hague Convention has the force of law within the United Kingdom by virtue of CACA 1985, s 1(2). [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by Jennifer Davis
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The first volume of The Lord of the Rings was published in the United States in 1954 with a paltry 1,500 copies; even though the Hobbit had done well, Tolkien’s publishers did not anticipate what a blockbuster success The Lord of the Rings would be. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am by Florian Mueller
"Huawei's counsel didn't have an immediate answer, but promised to check.In the United States, the court would have requested the views of the Solicitor General of the United States ("CVSG"). [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68.   [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The officers had been involved in executing the arrest of Babar Ahmed (who was subsequently convicted of terrorism offences and served a sentence in the United States) at Mr Ahmed’s home in December 2003. [read post]