Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 161 - 180 of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2010, 2:23 am by Adam Wagner
Read more: The ECtHR judgment Our case summary of  Carson; Reynolds v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (May 2005 – House of Lords, 2003 – Court of Appeal) Media coverage in The Guardian and on the BBC website [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
United States Applications for summary judgment have been filed in “Dr. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The UKSC Appeal The appeal will be heard on 18 and 19 November 2015 by a panel of five comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:19 pm
Illueca, Enforcing the United Nations Security Council’s Arms Embargo on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: A Case Study of the Legal Consequences of the Chong Chon Gang Incident Stephen Allen, Dean v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
This is how he interprets the case law of the ECtHR at [109]: “It is true that in S v United Kingdom the court does not expressly refer to the reasonable expectation of privacy but its analysis seems to me to be consistent with it. [read post]
Lord Wilson stated in his judgment that stage one had been complied with, the oral explanation that the recall was a result of L’s mental health having deteriorated was sufficient to satisfy stage one of the process. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011 When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
R (G) v Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 was the appeal to the House of Lords of this Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr McGeough was not convicted of any offences in Germany, but was later extradited to the United States, where he pleaded guilty to moving weapons between states without a licence. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
London Borough of Enfield [2001] 2 AC 550, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson; this terminology was misunderstood by the ECtHR in Osman v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In 2005, the Egyptian Government requested that the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council include Mr Youssef on a list of persons “associated with Al-Qaida” and therefore subject to an asset freeze. [read post]
Gender reassignment recognition Prior to the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Goodwin v United Kingdom, the law in the United Kingdom made no provision for gender reassignment recognition. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:30 am by Christopher J. Robinette
Instead, Lahav insists that the doctrinal rule for producers of injurious products in the United States in the nineteenth century was negligence liability. [read post]