Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc" Results 241 - 260 of 1,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court overturned the physical presence standard established in two earlier cases, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 11:33 am by Amy Howe
United States (Jan. 14) Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]