Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc" Results 341 - 360 of 1,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 9:46 am by Josh Wright
” “According to the department, without the judicially monitored restrictions, Google’s control over this key asset “would have substantially lessened competition among providers of comparative flight search websites in the United States, resulting in reduced choice and less innovation for consumers. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., No. 07-1239 (Nov. 12, 2008):Ruling preserves Navy strength in defenseThe United States has done more than any other country to protect whales, porpoises, seals and other marine mammals. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
(See for example, MDG Computers Canada Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm by Alisa Melekhina
”   The day after the Court’s unanimous ruling, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a preliminary guiding memorandum. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as unsafe for  <> BTLaw Alert: EPA Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" - The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register soon, starting a 90-day comment period <> Supreme Court to Decide Whether CERCLA Statute Can Revive Otherwise Time-Barred Toxic Tort Suit - The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by Neil Wilkof
Add to this the alleged potential for "abuse" of discretion by the PTO director by virtue of the Supreme Court decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:11 pm by Kalvis Golde
Migliori 22-30Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should vacate, under United States v. [read post]