Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc" Results 501 - 520 of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Casey Johnston
Department of Justice NEW YORK—In a Manhattan courtroom, Apple and the Department of Justice gave their opening statements in the e-book price-fixing case United States of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Written Description, Lisa Ouellette offers some “thoughts on the policy tradeoffs” at play in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff itself acknowledged this crowded field in its application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:23 pm by John C. Manoog III
About 2.5 million units were sold in the United States, along with an additional 55,000 in Canada. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A new decision by Justice Myers of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Theralase Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
USPTO is IncompleteBy: Kristin Wall In March of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Southern District of New York invalidated Myriad Genetics' patents on the BRCA1/2 genes, which predict susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]