Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 1:09 pm
Would a central, online licensing platform for high-volume, low-value uses (a ‘‘copyright hub’’) be a useful endeavor in the United States? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 11:55 am
Standard of Review In Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Inc.,[8] which had different facts to the case in point, and also emphasized the decision in Evans v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
In reversing the Southern District, the Second Circuit held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 1:29 pm
United States so that you don't have to go insane. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:49 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., A-86/87-11, 2013 WL 3716939 (N.J. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
Sept. 12, 2007) (granting stay requested by wireless carriers and handset manufacturers);Dynatec Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:36 am
Guido v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:50 am
Culinart, Inc., Case No. 12 Civ. 293 (JMF), the employer operated dining facilities at schools, corporations, and elsewhere across the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [5] Citing FTC v. [read post]
