Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc" Results 121 - 140 of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 5:35 am by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:26 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Co., Inc., the Court concluded that the requirement to fulfill the creativity standard is “extremely low; even a slight amount [of creativity] will suffice. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm by WIMS
" Petitioners -- the State of Texas; the Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and representatives of nationwide manufacturing, chemical and petroleum industries -- petition for review of the EPA's action under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am by Kali Borkoski
  The Court called for the views of  the Solicitor General in the following cases: DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am by Matt C. Bailey
However, as discussed in my previous post (here), this very line of reasoning was deemed an abuse of discretion by the Ninth Circuit in United Steel v. [read post]