Search for: "United States v. M/V Santa Clara I" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
So the Santa Clara District Attorney refiles.The problem is the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am by centerforartlaw
And I think, you know, the general public have constructed a folk hero, and Im not going to take that away from them. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Eric Goldman
Nevertheless, as the semester has already started at Santa Clara Law, I’ll do my rundown of my 2022 outputs-to-date anyway. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Deepfakes, Privacy, and Freedom of Speech, YourWitness Blog, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, 2021, Christa Laser, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Eric Goldman, Santa Clara University – School of Law. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I'm sure the Justices were annoyed that Judges Canby, Graber, and Friedland wasted everyone's time. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
But if Im not, my ghost will collect the money. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
Overview of the Bill The bill has three main components: dictating procedural operations for UGC sites (what I call the “Santa Clara Principles”); reducing Section 230; and requesting studies. 1) “Santa Clara Principles” The Santa Clara Principles emerged alongside the Santa Clara University conference on Content Moderation and Removal in 2018. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm by Edward Smith
Black Box: Powerful Eye Witness in Car Accident Cases Im Ed Smith, a Car Accident Attorney in Sacramento. [read post]