Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
MacDonald), 162 N.H. at 66, 27 A.3d 813.The defendant argues that `[t]here is a long line of cases’ beginning with State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
Larimer of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York issued an opinion denying the defendants' motion to dismiss in Preston v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:54 am by Simon Fodden
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court delivered a 7-2 opinion about violent video games: Brown, Governor Of California, et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) (joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Thomas) gives a bit of the background:Despite the text [of the Fifth Amendment], we held in Griffin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 6:44 am
MacDonald Watson Waste Oil Co., 933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991) and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Citing Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York v PERB, 6 NY3d 563 and Town of Wallkill v CSEA, Town of Wallkill Police Department Unit, 19 NY3d 1066, the court said “as the [Nassau] County Legislature expressly committed disciplinary authority over the Nassau County Police Department to the Commissioner of Police, collective bargaining over disciplinary matters was prohibited. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Niemela accepted Google could not comply with an order compelling it to block defamatory search results in the United States and would not enforce a foreign judgment which would violate free speech rights [33]. [read post]