Search for: "United States v. MacDonald"
Results 41 - 60
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2008, 2:22 am
Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
See, Brothers v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
”Citing Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York v PERB, 6 NY3d 563 and Town of Wallkill v CSEA, Town of Wallkill Police Department Unit, 19 NY3d 1066, the court said “as the [Nassau] County Legislature expressly committed disciplinary authority over the Nassau County Police Department to the Commissioner of Police, collective bargaining over disciplinary matters was prohibited. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 4:53 pm
MacDonald. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
Mr Niemela accepted Google could not comply with an order compelling it to block defamatory search results in the United States and would not enforce a foreign judgment which would violate free speech rights [33]. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm
For many years now, the prevailing case on injunctions in Canada has been the Supreme Court’s decision in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Macdonald [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Macdonald [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:39 pm
MacDonald and originally edited by David W. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:00 am
Judicial consideration of sandbagging Unlike express sandbagging provisions, which courts in both Canada and the United States will generally enforce, there is no clear answer in Canadian case law if sandbagging is, or is not, permitted when it is not directly addressed in the agreement. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
MacDonald and James W.J. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:53 pm
” Goodwin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
Wilfred MacDonald, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
United States.) [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Case number: 11-cv-03386 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York)Case filed: July 14, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 19, 2014 9/24/2014 12/23/2014 2014-98 In the Matter of Keith MacDonald SummersAdministrative Proceeding File No. [read post]