Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
 Katfriends Morag MacDonald (Bird & Bird, left), Richard Vary (Nokia), Sally Field (Bristows) and the eponymous Mehmet Gün are there too, not to mention EPLAW Honorary President Pierre Véron, Margot Fröhlinger (all the way from Eponia), knowledgeable Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), the dashing Justin Turner QC and, well, you can see for yourself who else is there ... [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
United States, the Court noted that true threats were not protected by the First Amendment, but there is conflicting case law on how a threat is to be assessed. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1125 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993); Crimm v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Corporations carry on business internationally and have affiliated offices throughout southern Ontario and the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by David Cheifetz
Justice Hugo Jackson wrote about the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Federal Court looked to jurisprudence from the United Kingdom, Cartier International AG v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
If accepted by the commission—or, on appeal, by either the United States Court of Military Commission Review (“USCMCR”) or the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]