Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rendered judgment last year, overturning the district court’s finding that the red soles could not be trademarked. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
MacDonald 12-1490Issue: Whether the Virginia courts unreasonably applied Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:48 am by Wells Bennett
The Fort Meade CCTV screen comes to life, as your correspondents return for another week of pre-trial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm by Wells Bennett
  And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm by Wells Bennett
What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm by Sandra Geddes
Message from the president of the United States, transmitting, in response to Senate resolution of February 11, 1889, a report upon the case of Louis Riel. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Bruce MacDonald) to allow such requests. [read post]