Search for: "United States v. MacDonald"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm
As set out by Smith J.A. in MacDonald v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:24 am
When Bruce MacDonald took over, nobody told me I was not chief trial judge any more. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
Recently, United States District Courts in Atlanta and Chicago have issued important opinions governing the manner in which these lawsuits should be handled. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:05 am
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Raw milk is healthier than pasteurized milk for babies.Raw milk activists in developed countries, especially the United States, mostly perpetuate this myth. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Bruce MacDonald) to allow such requests. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:22 pm
In Round v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm
Khalid 2010 ONCA 861 United States of America v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
Bizarrely, given what followed, I spent 11 September 2001 only a few miles away from the United States military base in Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
MacDonald, Aiden Francis. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
The rationale for such strict contempt laws is that they compensate for the fact that in Britain, unlike the United States, we have very limited jury vetting and so prejudicial material must be especially carefully controlled before and during the trial. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:43 am
United States, the Court noted that true threats were not protected by the First Amendment, but there is conflicting case law on how a threat is to be assessed. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
Better yet, perhaps the MacDonald medical malpractice appeal will be taken to the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
