Search for: "United States v. Mack" Results 61 - 80 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2012, 12:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additional billing or a minimal amount of subsequent work does not alter the completion date for the project (State of New York v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 China then began rejecting all corn from the United States containing the MIR 162 trait, which persisted for over a year. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
Mack 14-990Issue: Whether a single-judge district court may determine that a complaint covered by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:15 pm by Geoffrey Manne
Today the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States supporting Apple’s petition for certiorari in its e-books antitrust case. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:15 pm by Geoffrey Manne
Today the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States supporting Apple’s petition for certiorari in its e-books antitrust case. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]