Search for: "United States v. Maes"
Results 41 - 60
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Feb. 12, 2018), Judge Mae D’Agostino of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York weighed in on the issue of when state court orders for removal and remediation resolve a potentially responsible party's liability to the government under Section 113 of CERCLA, and in this case allowing, for at least the time being, Section 107 claims to proceed where there was no clear guidance from the Second Circuit. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:07 pm
H-16-1053.United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Fannie Mae filed its forcible detainer suit on February 8, 2013, before the changes to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure took effect. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
The earliest cases involved entities like the Bank of the United States; the most recent one is a 1992 decision, American National Red Cross v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am
For example, federal courts always have jurisdiction over suits to which the United States is a party. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:04 pm
[JURIST] On Tuesday the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari [order, PDF] for eight new cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
” In last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm
Moreover, it argues, U.S. courts have jurisdiction under the FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, which (among other things) allows lawsuits based on conduct that takes place outside the United States “in connection with a commercial activity of a foreign state” and causes a direct effect in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:49 am
Desito, United States District Judge for the Northern District of New York Judge Mae D'Agostino granted summary judgment for... [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
Violinist Vanessa-Mae has been awarded damages for defamation from the International Ski Federation (FIS). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The denial of review in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
