Search for: "United States v. Malcolm" Results 21 - 40 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:07 am by Preston Lim
This is well accepted in Canadian law, and indeed in the law of most countries, including that of the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
She is the author of Talking to Strangers[1] written in 2004 which focuses on interracial distrust in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am by Liron Libman
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Since the mid-1970s, he has been deeply pessimistic about the possibilities of political change: Political action of any sort, he believes, cannot improve or ameliorate the condition of black people in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am by Lisa Heinzerling
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus, Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart urged the court to adopt the EPA’s interpretation, but conspicuously did not ask the court to defer to it. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Appearing before the Supreme Court were Malcolm Stewart, representing the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and Morgan Chu, representing NantKwest, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Unites States According to court filings in the defamation lawsuit, Elon Musk overruled advice from his inner circle at Tesla and SpaceX that he offer a “genuine” apology and take a Twitter break after using the social media platform to attack a critic last year. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am by John Malcolm
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court should have revived a doctrine that prohibits Congress from delegating its authority to other entities, observing that “[i]t’s not often one has the opportunity to undo an original sin. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The father of a victim of the massacre at Sandy Hook, has won a defamation suit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, purporting a series of false claims. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am by Jennifer Davis
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jewish international law jurist who lived and taught law in the United States at the end of his life, is famous for coining the word “genocide”. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm by Erik Slobe
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]