Search for: "United States v. Marcus" Results 101 - 120 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 11:34 am by Zach Heck
The District Court, like many trial courts faced with data breach causes of action, relied upon the United States Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Clapper v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On August 3, 2015, Neiman Marcus requested en banc review of the Seventh Circuit’s recent decision in Remijas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:55 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
The Seventh Circuit’s analysis of imminent injury distinguished the Supreme Court of the United States’ opinion in Clapper v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm by John C. Manoog III
One particular drug, an antidepressant manufactured by Forest Pharmaceuticals and commonly known as “Lexapro,” recently came under fire in the case of Marcus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), and Marcus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by Michelle Kisloff and Arthur Kim
  The subsequent class actions, on behalf of United States customers, were consolidated into the District of Minnesota. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am by Jim Walker
" Justice Marcus stated:  “Here, the roots of the Barbetta rule snake back in to a wholly different world. [read post]