Search for: "United States v. Marcus" Results 121 - 140 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am by Andrew Delaney
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm
On April 2, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the decision of New Jersey District Court Judge Dennis M. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
”  The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:15 am by Abigail Perkiss
The first case in American legal history to formally begin to undo the generations of legally prescribed residential segregation in the United States, Shelley v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
”  In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus similarly decries the ruling, contending that, although the United States is “a predominantly Christian nation,” “we live here, too — we are Americans, too — and the Constitution, which prohibits elevating one religion over another, demands some sensitivity to this fact. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
To illustrate, the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm by Luke Rioux
On 1/27/14 the United States Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]