Search for: "United States v. Marcus" Results 161 - 180 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
But in the United States, proseuction history is part of the intrinsic evidence considered in claim construction, i.e., it's part of the most important category of evidence. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by Cormac Early
In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus discusses the possibility of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:34 am by Steve Hall
Here's the beginning: Marcus Druery says that his cell on death row at Livingston's Polunsky Unit is wired. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Steve Hall
That is according to attorneys who have asked a state district court to delay his death. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Wessen Jazrawi
The courts Marcus Ellis and Rodrigo Simms and Nathan Antonio Martin v. the United Kingdom 46099/06 & 46699/06 [2012] ECHR 813 (10 April 2012).  [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm by Zachary Spilman
Nealy, 71 M.J. _ (C.A.A.F. 2012) and United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:54 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
25 years ago today, when the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to fairness in the death penalty with its ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 2:26 pm by Zachary Spilman
Also of interest from the CAAFlog archives is this 2009 post from Marcus Fulton discussing jurisdictional issues in the wake of United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether purposefully flooding land is a Fifth Amendment taking. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:16 am by Steve Kalar
I do not believe that we should participate in this utterly empty gesture.United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
The United States asks us to affirm this sentence. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]