Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
As part of the rollback of environmental regulations, the Trump Administration has finally completed their longed for repeal of the 2015 definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
The Georgia State University College of Law will hold a one-day symposium on Friday, October 23, 2009, to mark the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's integration mandate in Olmstead v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:17 pm
§292 or any other statute related to false marking or false advertising on behalf of the United States andlor the general public with regard to U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:35 am
The Board found this evidence to be substantial, but it concerned only recent years and lacked industry context, and the revenue figures were not limited to the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 3:40 am
" On the other hand, consumers would perceive respondent’s Red, White and Blue Fence Post Mark as referring to "the national colors of the United States of America, or the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:20 am
United States, 488 F.3d 163, 175 (3d Cir. 2007). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
More info is provided in this blog post.Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (11 Jan. 2023) [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:03 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that “‘an applicant’s preparations to use a mark in commerce are insufficient to constitute use in commerce. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
The opinion is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:50 am
” NetChoice, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:15 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
"San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am
Mark Spognardi Jesse Dill Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:00 am
Trump Stands Up For Religious Freedom In The United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 4:56 am
" ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
