Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 261 - 280
of 10,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
Finally, there are three defendants based outside of the EU – Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC in the United States and Google Payment Limited in the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Miss United States of America LLC, DBA United States of America Pageants v.Abundance Productions, LLC, Cancellation No. 92071814 (March 8, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Melanye K. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm
Across the United States, a growing number of states prohibited transgender youths from obtaining gender-affirming health care, and some restricted access for transgender adults. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff;… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
” As More described England, the United States also is “planted thick with laws, from coast to coast. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
Case date: 12 January 2024 Case number: No. 21-55881 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by… [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Konin and Mark S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Especially in the western United States, sprawling homeless encampments have become ubiquitous, to the disgust and dismay of local residents. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
In political, scientific, and artistic history, consider any biography or history describing Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Hannibal, Vincent van Gogh, Alan Turing, Ernest Hemingway, Marilyn Monroe, or Kurt Cobain. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
