Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 301 - 320 of 9,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Baringer; James R BullmanSource of Law: United StatesLouisianaVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Trademark InfringementCourt Name: United States District Court, Middle District of LouisianaLegal Counsel: Stephen G. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
United States Plywood laid down what has become the case law bible for assessing damages, listing 15 factors for consideration in assessing damages--, note that the 1970 decision is a district court decision [ 318 F. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 5:45 am by Family Law
From JD Supra: Last Spring, the United States Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) with a 7-2 decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am by Beth Hutchens
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion on the Stolen Valor Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 12:17 pm by Tom Smith
  This is a partial family portrait of, from front to back, Chopi, me, Gandalf the Lion Hearted, LWJ, Mitzi the Wonderful dog unit, Mark, Patrick, his girlfriend Whitney, and Samwise, recently sort-of rescued from Shanghai, the People's (not Dogs') Republic of China. [read post]
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by The Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff] argues it should not have to pay any costs because it was acting in the public interest by bringing the lawsuit as a qui tam relator to help the United States enforce the false marking statute; and if anything, it should only be required to pay half of any allowable costs. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm by Dan Ernst
Maryland, will be held Thursday, October 9, 2014 at 6:00 pm in the Chamber of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
”  The name Earl Warren should ring a bell, as he would later become the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, at the time that the Court heard the Brown v. [read post]