Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 321 - 340
of 9,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm
Then a draft of a amicus brief Lemly filed today with the United States Supreme Court arrived in my inbox and I knew this was the issue that would make for an excellent interview. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" As to meaning, applicant's mark "suggests a subset of Opposer's TEQUILA emanating from or associated with the United States of America. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 2:22 am
Respondent "essentially argues that petitioner lacks standing because it neither pleaded use nor registration of its mark in the United States, nor otherwise pleaded any trademark rights in its mark that are protectable in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
In United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:16 am
SYMPOSIUM – 2022 – SAFEGUARDING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO VOTE The Post-Trump Rightward Lurch in Election Law by Michael Kang on April 29, 2022 The United States Supreme Court’s decisions last Term, Brnovich v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:41 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
United States, vacated the decision of the Seventh Circuit, and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:03 am
Still, nowhere is it written that when the shells come out, the mark can’t take a hammer to them.Footnotes1 Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
Slip Op. 09813 at *13-14, but, in doing so, specifically stated that it did not recognize the famous marks doctrine as an independent theory of liability under state law. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
The rule laid out in Marks v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:57 am
Winslow Jr. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:09 pm
This discussion has addressed the requirement that a proposed trademark be "used" or be "in use" when a trademark registration is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
On July 27, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, threw out claims that Maker’s Mark violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), ruling that the plaintiffs did not plausibly allege a likelihood of deception. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
It’s available in most stores across the United States…except for Wisconsin. [read post]
