Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 341 - 360
of 9,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
Any opposition battle for KYLIE in Australia would be more heavily weighed in Ms Minogue's favour than in the United States, in light of both existing trade marks, and reputation and use. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
” By “neo-Garrisonians,” I refer to those historians whose historical work unblinkingly examines the racist past of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:10 pm
Maker’s Mark Distillery, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 5:18 pm
As predicted, the United States has filed a cert petition and stay application in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in Corcamore, LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:52 pm
By: Mark Stepanyuk The United States led the world in internet usage throughout the 1990s and “[a]t the time of the Dot-com-crash less than 7% of the world was online. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Mayorkas "Plaintiff Mark Bristow, a United States citizen, has filed a Form I-130 petition for an immigrant visa on behalf of his husband, Plaintiff Felixberto Tinga Villamil II. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
’s rights in the famous mark BARBIE were not enough to for our Supreme Court to find a likelihood of confusion with a restaurant operating under the name Barbie’s (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22). [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:07 am
Qurate Retail, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am
Leonid Nahshin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
See Iancu v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:24 am
After the decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
