Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 361 - 380 of 9,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm by Gene Quinn
On September 3, 2010, IHOP IP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the owner of various IHOP registered trademarks in the United States, sued the International House of Prayer alleging various trademark infringement theories. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:37 am
 This concept used to exist under the United Kingdom's Trade Marks Act 1938; the Mathys Report on British Trade Mark Law and Practice, Cmnd 5601, May 1974, recommended scrapping it and it was indeed erased when the United Kingdom implemented the new, exciting norms of harmonised European national trade marks in its Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:05 am by Docket Navigator
[Plaintiff] therefore imports these products into the United States, and it was required to mark them under Section 287(a). [read post]
Case date: 27 October 2021 Case number: No: 20-2277 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm by Jake Ward
United States, 239 U.S. 510, 517–18 (1916)). [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
" Lodestar then began use its mark in the United States in 2014.Lodestar won the priority battle but lost the trademark infringement war. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am by Paul Horwitz
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:41 am by Record on Appeal
In 2001, the United States Supreme Court held in Palazzolo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:52 pm
The Commerce Clause to the United States Constitution provides that Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]