Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 61 - 80
of 9,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488),… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:02 pm
“Trump’s Shield on the Bench: Brett Kavanaugh’s criticism of United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
This December the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided a significant case interpreting the false marking provision of United States Patent Law. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
” (8) Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm
Siler Since 1992, the question of whether a state could require a business to collect and remit sales tax has been governed by the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Quill v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:28 pm
United States. [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
See Express Mobile, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am
For a useful 2012 analysis of Swedish extradition law and process, see Stockholm University’s Mark Klamberg here.) [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Georgia and the ACLU of North Carolina today filed lawsuits in federal courts in Georgia and North Carolina on behalf of Mark Lyttle, a U.S. citizen of Puerto Rican descent with mental... [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
United States: An Emerging Model for Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy in the United States (Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 21, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
United States: How can such a small case be such a big game-changer? [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:24 pm
As the nation marks the 60th anniversary of the unanimous Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that an EU trade mark (EUTM) proprietor may bring an infringement action in an EU Member State where advertising or offers for sale are directed or located, in a case concerning alleged infringement of an EUTM in the United Kingdom by a Spanish defendant. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
