Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
However, she did not allege that her marks were in use in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm
Respondent Dylla was a citizen of the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:55 am
This proceeding was commenced after Mark refused to return the children to Germany after visitation in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
This proceeding was commenced after Mark refused to return the children to Germany after visitation in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
The United States Supreme Court is engaged in behavior never before seen in American history argues Mark Lemley, the William H. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
United States of America Rugby Football Union, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3553885 (D. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
United States, the Supreme Court will revisit a thorny question: how to determine the precedential... [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
The less-known case (United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on June 8, 1911. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 10:51 am
See AFPU v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am
Mark Hertsgaard has a piece in the Guardian examining US TV news lack of commentary on climate change stating- “its media malpractice not to mention that burning fossil fuels drives extreme weather events like Hurricane Ida”. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(g) Patents, trade-marks, utility models and designs shall be deemed to be situated at the place where the trade, business or profession to which it pertains is carried on. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:29 am
CALL FOR PAPERS: For a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:50 am
On June 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Curtis Flowers. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
To mark the 150th Anniversary of the Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
