Search for: "United States v. Martin" Results 1 - 20 of 1,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2025, 5:28 am by Bernard Bell
Biden, representing the United States, rejoined the 2016 Paris Climate Agreements. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
” “Lima has argued that the awards shouldn’t be enforced in the United States because of alleged corruption tainting the judgments. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish standing, an organizational plaintiff . . . must show that at least one of its members would have standing to sue, that it is representative of the organizational purposes it asserts and that the case would not require the participation of individual members" (New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello, 2 NY3d 207, 211). [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish standing, an organizational plaintiff . . . must show that at least one of its members would have standing to sue, that it is representative of the organizational purposes it asserts and that the case would not require the participation of individual members" (New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello, 2 NY3d 207, 211). [read post]
15 May 2025, 4:37 am by Weronika Galka
Ed Martin, the former interim U.S. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Martin rule establishes "pleading and evidence requirements" for plaintiff to satisfy to "maintain[] [this] action" (Salemeh v Toussaint, 25 AD3d 411, 411 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Martin rule establishes "pleading and evidence requirements" for plaintiff to satisfy to "maintain[] [this] action" (Salemeh v Toussaint, 25 AD3d 411, 411 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 12:30 pm by John Ross
United States, the wrong-door raid case that the Supreme Court will hear next week. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Inflation Reduction Act’s passage roughly seven months after the Multiplan decision likely contributed to pushing SPACs out of the United States (and, therefore, Delaware). [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am by INFORRM
In  the case of Green v United Kingdom [2025] ECHR 91 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a failure by Parliament to prevent Lord Hain from revealing  information about Sir Philip Green (“the Applicant”) which was subject to a privacy injunction was not a  violation of Article 8. [read post]
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by Alan B. Morrison
Securities and Exchange Commission and United States v. [read post]