Search for: "United States v. Martinez-Fuerte"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
Guest blogger: Norah Cunningham, law student, University of San Francisco “Hands-on-the-Hips” Arguments: Replacing Legal Reasoning with an Underlying Rhetoric of Fear and Criminalization In my Legal Research, Writing and Analysis class, my professor cautioned my class of fresh-faced 1Ls against... [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:49 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976); United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976); United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 560–561 (1976). [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 5:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Martinez-Fuerte and Colorado v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
United States;United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
It distinguished all the other roadblock cases, including United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
In 1976, the Supreme Court decided in U.S. v Martinez-Fuerte that Border Patrol may operate checkpoints and stop vehicles, without a warrant, for brief questioning of their immigration status even if they have no particularized suspicion of unlawful activity or immigration status. [read post]
