Search for: "United States v. Mason" Results 121 - 140 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case is out of the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am by Barry Sookman
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Trademark Office (PDF) Reply Brief for Petitioner Bernard L. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
Texas and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:15 am by Ilya Somin
It also claims that virtually everyone in the United States qualifies under (C), because, in March 2020, then-President Trump declared the entire country a “disaster area” because of COVID. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm by William McGinley
  The lawsuit is an Administrative Procedures Act challenge – not a constitutional challenge - to the electioneering communications reporting requirements that were amended by the FEC in the wake of the United States Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin Right to Life v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]