Search for: "United States v. Matlock" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Matlock applies to vehicle searches; here a taxicab
9 May 2008, 5:18 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
CAAF: Matlock and Randolph must be read together; CA9 rejected, CA7,8 followed
23 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Supreme Court allows disputed home searches without warrants
4 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
  In 1974 the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
Cincinnati Law Library Blog - http://cincinnatilaw.blogspot.com/
United States Supreme Court Clarifies When Consent to Search by One Residential Occupant Is Valid When a Co-Occupant Has Previously Objected
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am by Bob Farb
In United States v. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
My Thoughts on Fernandez v. California
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm by Orin Kerr
First, in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
CA5: Where defendant in jail and refuses consent, Randolph doesn't bar going to house to get consent from cotenant
14 Mar 2012, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Rules of evidence do not apply to suppression hearings, except for privileges; transcript of another proceeding admitted
2 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
W.D.Ky.: Defendant had REP in his work computer, but employer could consent
20 Aug 2009, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Paying rent does not necessarily convert "common authority" into landlord-tenant relationship
7 May 2008, 7:23 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
M.D.Pa.: Burglary in progress call justified protective sweep
21 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
W.D.Mich.: No apparent authority in a person without a key to the property who was locked out
18 May 2010, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Randolph did not prohibit entry to retrieve gun where defendant's girlfriend feared him coming back
9 Nov 2008, 11:35 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
S.D.Ohio: GFE applies to pre-Gant search incident
24 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
N.D.Ill.: Exclusionary rule would not be applied to determine what was covered by suppression order
15 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
M.D. Fla.: Defendant has to be present and have objected to invoke Randolph
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
CA7: The person with the keys and alarm code to open a business appeared to have apparent authority to consent
6 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
C.D.Cal.: Motion to reconsider granted; court imposed wrong burden of proof on stop at government's request :: Practice Pointer
8 May 2010, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
CA3: Owning a hard drive in somebody else's computer assumes the risk of disclosure
3 May 2010, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
More on Formalism and Bright-Line Rules: USSC Georgia v. Randolph
4 Apr 2006, 8:45 am
United Kingdom (see previous post and comments), the concept again figures prominently in last week's United States Supreme Court decision in Georgia v. [read post]
ComparativeLawBlog - http://comparativelawblog.blogspot.com/
D.Utah: Defendant has burden of showing drug dog is not qualified [Wrong!]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1