Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 81 - 100 of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2008, 7:43 am
Recently the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down an important decision regarding the enforceability of open software licences (in ROBERT JACOBSEN v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Shah, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will argue for the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
”  Matthew Hofstedt, Associate Curator, Office of the Curator, Supreme Court of the United States, kindly consulted the Supreme Court's journal for me and found (on p. 213) that on the day Crowell v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges' ability to increase sentences sua sponte. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:54 pm
By Matthew Hinks In an opinion containing echoes of the United States Supreme Court's controversial and much maligned decision in Kelo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm
Janine Cox and Nathan Webb won in State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Kristin Hickman (University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law) and Matthew Krueger (United States Court of Appeals) have posted In Search of the 'Modern' Skidmore Standard on SSRN. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish… [read post]