Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 141 - 160 of 1,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 7:33 pm
By Matthew Hinks The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
By Matthew Hinks The California legislature has declared the availability of housing for every Californian to be a matter of "vital statewide importance." [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:12 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
The Sixth Circuit today published United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 3:05 pm by Matthew Wild
  This legislation is remarkable in light of all the uproar over the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Matthew John Ryan and Prime Rate And Return, LLC, individually and doing business as American Integrity Financial Co.Case number: 10-cv-0513 (United States District Court for the Northern District of New York)Case filed: May 3, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 2, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-47 SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:17 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
On February 15, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Amelia Landenberger
This one’s very simple and straightforward: become President of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm by Michael O'Hear
 The Court emphasized the high level of deference that federal habeas courts must show to state-court decisions on the merits, particularly state-court decisions rejecting Jackson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
In this habeas case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit set aside two 29-year-old murder convictions based on the flimsiest of rationales. [read post]