Search for: "United States v. McClain" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
McClain, Do Public Accommodations Laws Compel “What Shall Be Orthodox”? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Linda C. McClain
McClain Julie Suk’s ambitious book, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It, contributes to a feminist literature on equality and care spanning centuries and national boundaries, yet offers timely diagnoses and prescriptions for the United States at a very particular moment. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But they made what seemed like a safe bet at the time—that the arc of history would lead to a permanent progressive majority on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
Linda McClain misses this distinction, which leaves me unable to say anything about her contribution. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Jennifer Davis
KF4755 .M37 2020 McClain, Linda C. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: That pragmatism can do—and already is doing—real work to repair and improve constitutional democracy in the United States is a conviction voiced in the academy, in social movements, and in social media. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]