Search for: "United States v. McDaniel" Results 81 - 100 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
" One of the petitions considered on Tuesday addresses the issue of whether federal judges have the power to release detainees into the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/29/10-99021o.pdf United State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Va. 1999) (granting motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim); Perry v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Siebert, 56, filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta after Judge Mark E. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946) ("[I]f one cannot say, with fair assurance, . . . that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error, it is impossible to conclude that substantial rights were not affected. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:59 am
Moreover, the 1963-90 Free Exercise Clause rules that the RFRAs were meant to restore included protections for elected officials, see McDaniel v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Press Releases
Kipel, Partner, Steptoe & Johnson LLP Christine McDaniel, Economic Adviser to Chairman Shara L. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The court found that Michael's opinion was contradicted by decedent's medical records and the testimony of her physician, who stated that decedent was in full control of her faculties during an examination on the day that she executed the 2015 Will. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]