Search for: "United States v. McDonnell Douglas Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2013, 2:31 pm by PaulKostro
., A-2391-11T4, June 6, 2013: Our courts evaluate New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42, claims under the burden-shifting analysis enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a cause of action for breach of contract accrues and the statute of limitations commences when the contract is breached and Petitioner did not file suit within one year of the alleged breach, the Circuit Court opined that his breach of contract claim was untimely.* McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:20 am by PaulKostro
A-4634-13T1, February 13, 2015: In order to prove a discriminatory discharge claim by indirect evidence under the familiar burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The district court granted the Corps' motion for summary judgment: The court declined to analyze the motion in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am by Lyle Denniston
The case’s origins go back to January 1988, when General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 6:32 pm by The Harman Firm
The Court ruled that a complainant for pregnancy discrimination must show that her pregnancy “actually motivated the employer’s decision” to deny accommodation through direct evidence that a workplace policy relies expressly on a protected characteristic or through the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:12 am by PaulKostro
(second and third alterations in original) (citations omitted) (first quoting McDonnell Douglas Corp., 411 U.S. at 802; then quoting Blackburn v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Affirming the district court’s decision granting CUNY summary judgment on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim, the court explained that under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
The Court was guided by the analytical framework articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]