Search for: "United States v. Medical Society of South Carolina" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in… [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
But here are a few titles you might not expect to see on a “banned books” list: Sketching Basics Batman: Eye of the Beholder Rand McNally Family World Atlas E=MC2: Simple Physics Acupressure for Emotional Healing Arizona Wildlife Views The Onion Book of Known Knowledge Merck Manual of Medical Information: Home Edition Mythology of Greece and Rome Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons For an interactive infographic featuring classic books once banned inside the… [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 9:50 am by Michael O'Neill
It would be like postulating employees without employer, or society without individuals. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
113 is therefore supported by modern society’s understanding of the role of a child in the family unit. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am by David DePaolo
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Hirsch.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
South Carolina, 237 U.S. 180 (1915)..............................................................2-3 Morales v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
The answer to that question started to crystallize when we agreed to sever the claim against OCA for the unconstitutional increases in medical co-payments and a decrease in medical/dental/optical benefits. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
South Carolina, 15-9329, four-time relist Broom v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Fourth Circuit encompasses Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia, and its rulings are binding on federal district courts (and state courts) in each of those states.The case arises out of the experience of a transgender boy who seeks to use the boys’ restrooms at his high school. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:56 am by Gritsforbreakfast
·         For more on the significant criminal justice reform during the 2012 legislative sessions, read the ACLU’s roundup blog from June.2012 ACLU Reports on Criminal Justice Reform:·         At America’s Expense: The Mass Incarceration of the Elderly: Elderly prisoners are twice as expensive to incarcerate as the average prisoner and pose little danger to society, yet the… [read post]