Search for: "United States v. Mejias"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:40 am
The case is Esperanza v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
U.S. v Hernandez-Mejia, May 16, 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day, Osorio v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Mejia-Hernadez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 12:04 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision on November 24, 2010, in a case styled, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 12:04 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision on November 24, 2010, in a case styled, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:46 am
INS, 296 F.3d 316 (4th Cir.2002) (asylum proceeding); United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Smith, United States Magistrate Judge, U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:53 am
On Friday the First Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:42 am
United States: blame the controllers because pilot became disoriented (0) [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 11:04 am
Since it's a very interesting piece of work in its own right, I'll help Name That Tune by giving a fairly expansive snippet thereof:"Four months ago, in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
" Id.The issue also includes a case note on the United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:16 pm
March 25, 2009) (available here) United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 5:16 pm
March 25, 2009) (available here) United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Here are the final four:In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Second Circuit reverses gang convictions based on erroneous law enforcement expert testimony, which included inadmissible testimony on factual matters; merely repeating hearsay statements without using expertise to reach an opinion; and repeating and summarizing the testimonial statements of others violated the Confrontation Clause, in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
