Search for: "United States v. Mejias"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
Here are the final four:In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:01 am
Second Circuit reverses gang convictions based on erroneous law enforcement expert testimony, which included inadmissible testimony on factual matters; merely repeating hearsay statements without using expertise to reach an opinion; and repeating and summarizing the testimonial statements of others violated the Confrontation Clause, in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
The problem with this kind of testimony, as the Second Circuit noted yesterday in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:57 pm
"Typically, such conduct is not sufficient to secure dismissal of criminal charges in the United States, due to US Supreme Court precedent in the case of United States v Alvarez-Machaim. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 04, 2008 State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Grigg
• Mejia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:40 am
Feb. 28, 2007):Since United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Mission The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 7:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
He therefore directed an election in a unit limited to VMT technicians. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 8:44 am
Just to beat this issue completely to death: The version of Pereira that currently appears on Westlaw (United States v. [read post]
