Search for: "United States v. Mendoza"
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
Mendoza at the United States/Mexico border in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the case was before the district court on Ms. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:05 am
Jewell, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the 2008 rule issued by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, which had itself revised the 1983 stream buffer zone rule. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:49 pm
Fulton County School District 13-307 Issue: Whether, when a plaintiff in federal court seeks to invoke nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel against a state or local government based on a prior state adjudication, the availability of collateral estoppel is governed by state or federal law; (2) whether, if federal law controls, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:02 pm
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
James-Frederick v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:59 am
Justia has this summary: Mendoza drove a truck from North Carolina to Tennessee with Tavera as a passenger. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm
Washburn student intern Amy Ahrens and I won in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
” Further, there is no legitimate expectation of privacy in an open field, so camera surveillance would be allowed under the privacy standards established by Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
The cases on asylum seekers referred to above rely on the right to dignity as a way of channelling social and economic rights through the grid of the ECHR and dignity is of course an oft-cited interest in litigation involving discrimination against homosexuals (see Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
