Search for: "United States v. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 2,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
In fact, businesses that do not have their headquarters or principal place of business in the United States are required to hire a U.S. attorney to apply for registration of their marks. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The sole member followed the advice of Skadden and caused the Boardwalk MLP general partner to exercise the call right and acquire all the public units pursuant to a formula in the Partnership Agreement. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
  A few years after deciding Pennsylvania Coal, the Supreme Court returned to regulatory takings with Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Drawing from comparative analysis and federal theory, we argue that elements of federal solidarity are readily identifiable in the United States and that conceiving of them as such helps to clarify doctrine, for example, around the dormant commerce clause and interstate sovereign immunity. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Challenges of FinTech June 14, 2022 | Jillian Moss Scholar sketches the current regulatory landscape for financial technologies in the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 7:36 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that “a preponderance of the evidence demonstrates Petitioner consented to the [children’s] removal to the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So this brings up two central questions: First, is it true that a Herculean justice, seeking unequivocal “right answers” to the questions posed by the United States Constitution, will feel forced by her oath of office to recognize a strong protection for the “right to keep and bear arms”? [read post]