Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 pm
The Impact of Birchfield v North Dakota (Bernard) There has been a lot of uncertainty regarding Minnesota’s DWI laws since the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) granted review of three DWI cases in December of 2015. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
United States (Fiduciary accountability)*Synopsis: Lineal descendants of Mdewakanton Sioux who were loyal to United States during 1862 Sioux Outbreak in Minnesota brought suit against United States for breach of fiduciary duty and contract in management of property originally provided for benefit of loyal Mdewakanton. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
On March 25, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:55 am
Hickman (Minnesota) offers her thoughts on Cohen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
Appealed from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Minneapolis. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:51 pm
On October 31, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Danforth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
A helpful reader forwarded to me today's Minnesota Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Moua v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:42 pm
District Court granted a motion for a preliminary injunction in Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
United States, 559 F.3d 1228 (Fed. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:23 am
On March 30, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inUnited States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:02 am
Instead, it is a unanimous opinion stating: "Instant Runoff Voting as adopted in Minneapolis is not facially invalid under the United States or Minnesota Constitution, and does not contravene any principles established by this court in Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:47 am
United States (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 100, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
United States, a federal district court in Minnesota held yesterday that Treas. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
Three Minnesota corporations — one that promotes anti-abortion causes, one that supports low taxes and limited government, and a for-profit corporation in the travel business — contended that the state law, applicable only in state elections, is just like a federal law at issue in the January decision (Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:23 am
In State of Minnesota v. [read post]
