Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 1 - 20 of 1,648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2025, 12:04 pm by Mariah McGrogan and Joseph Flanagan
The employee – alongside the United States, which supported the employee as an amicus – argued that the “background circumstances” rule went against the framework outlined in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2025, 7:45 am by Unknown
United States," Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, vol. 20 (Forthcoming, 2025) [preprint]Featured Issue: U.S. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:27 am by Chiraag Bains
In February 2025, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger asked U.S. [read post]
17 May 2025, 5:17 am by Bill Marler
A total of 14 deaths were reported from 9 states: California, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New York, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington. [read post]
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm by Kalvis Golde
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 1:56 pm by CFM Admin
The new rule exempts all domestic entities and U.S. person beneficial owners from BOI reporting obligations, and redefines “reporting company” to include only foreign entities registered to do business in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:06 pm by NARF
Morse (Regulatory Jurisdiction; Amended Complaint; Futility) United States, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:13 am by Eric Goldman
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment. [read post]