Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 21 - 40 of 1,818
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 9:02 am
Instead, it is a unanimous opinion stating: "Instant Runoff Voting as adopted in Minneapolis is not facially invalid under the United States or Minnesota Constitution, and does not contravene any principles established by this court in Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:47 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States (Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 100, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Three Minnesota corporations — one that promotes anti-abortion causes, one that supports low taxes and limited government, and a for-profit corporation in the travel business — contended that the state law, applicable only in state elections, is just like a federal law at issue in the January decision (Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Unknown
Reports & journal articles:Brief of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Case O.A., et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
In its conclusion, the Appeals Court said, ". . .we dismiss Northshore's appeal, dismiss the United States' cross-appeal, and affirm the district court's conclusion that the air-emissions provisions of the injunction are moot. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:40 am by Dan Filler
This just in: Journal of Law and Public Policy Fall 2023 Symposium Topic: Free Speech and the United States Constitution Date:   November 17, 2023 (speakers are welcome to participate in-person or by Zoom) University of St. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm by Michael Kraut
The Minnesota Supreme Court handed down a unanimous ruling in two cases: State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:15 pm by Immigration Prof
Cesar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández’s blog recently posted a helpful analysis of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Linda A. Kerns
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion regarding a Minnesota state statute that retroactively revokes designations of spouses of beneficiaries of life insurance policies upon divorce. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Three churches and their pastors filed suit this week in a Minnesota federal district court challenging the state's COVID-19 limits on worship services. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Right to a Public Trial – Background The right to a public trial is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm by LundgrenJohnson
  And, the question of whether an officer must provide a driver the opportunity to speak with counsel, even when requesting a test outside of Minnesota’s Implied Consent statutory scheme that carries various civil penalties, is currently under review by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:35 am
Robins, the United States Supreme Court held that the owner... [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm by EEM
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]