Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 401 - 420 of 1,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Drew, which considered whether Terms of Service violations trigger CFAA liability, and United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:28 am
But as Target points out, Minnesota has recognized this “separate and distinct” special relationship doctrine, Domagala v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:20 pm by Scott R. Flick and Elizabeth Craig
  Under the FCC’s EEO Rule, all radio and television station employment units (“SEUs”), regardless of staff size, must afford equal opportunity to all qualified persons and practice nondiscrimination in employment. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by NARF
Frey (Maine Indian Settlement Acts; Reservation Boundaries) United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm by Dan Ernst
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Alps involved an issue of inequitable conductThis suit was filed by The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) against Alps South, LLC (“Alps”) for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,830,237 (the “’237 patent”). [read post]
25 May 2020, 1:14 pm by STEPHEN HOLZER
    The liberal Attorneys General of nine States (New York, California, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia) have filed a lawsuit in the federal court for the Southern District of New York (New York, et al. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:21 pm by Coby Nixon
Feb. 9, 2010) (Thrash, J.)Judge Thrash granted the Defendant’s motion to transfer this declaratory action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota for consolidation with the Defendant’s first-filed suit for patent infringement. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:28 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]