Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 441 - 460 of 1,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Initially, the NBAM covers eight states: California, Utah, Minnesota, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maine. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:03 am by Ettinger Law Firm
  The United States District Court of Minnesota then granted summary judgment for the Sveen children and awarded them life insurance proceeds. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Some recent acquisitions include United Hospital District acquiring Smart Clinic in Minnesota, Morris Hospital’s acquisition of John Bolden MS & Raja Saleem MD in Illinois, and Jonestown Family Medicine being acquired by Premier Health in Ohio [18]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Some recent acquisitions include United Hospital District acquiring Smart Clinic in Minnesota, Morris Hospital’s acquisition of John Bolden MS & Raja Saleem MD in Illinois, and Jonestown Family Medicine being acquired by Premier Health in Ohio [18]. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am by George Basharis
Case date: 20 September 2019 Case number: No. 18-2388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Linda Morris
Fifty years after the enactment of the Fair Housing Act (FHA), housing discrimination remains a national disgrace in the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States  (Fiduciary Trust) Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]